• Users Online: 74
  • Print this page
  • Email this page
CASE SERIES
Year : 2018  |  Volume : 2  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 139-143

Autopilot, criminal responsibility, and diversion: A case series


Consultant Psychiatrist, Sheffield Health and Social Care NHS Foundation Trust, UK

Correspondence Address:
Ajaykumar Vishwasrao Pawar
Forest Lodge, 5, Forest Close, Sheffield, S35 0JW
UK
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/aip.aip_44_18

Rights and Permissions

Intent or mens rea and the Act or actus reus are essential components of a crime and absence of one can lead to complete acquittal of the defendant. I report two cases where there are broad similarities in the nature of the mental disorder, but the intent was lacking in one of the cases. The interplay between symptoms of mental illness, presence of intent, and other relevant factors can lead to differing outcomes when the cases go to the court. An opinion from a psychiatrist is valuable in such cases and indeed written and/or oral evidence from a psychiatrist is required under the mental health act in the UK before certain decision can be taken in the court.


[FULL TEXT] [PDF]*
Print this article     Email this article
 Next article
 Previous article
 Table of Contents

 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
 Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert *
 Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed24    
    Printed3    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded6    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal